Oberlo, LinkedIn, The average LinkedIn user spends 17 minutes on the site per month. Wordstream, LinkedIn has over million users. LinkedIn, LinkedIn has million members. Omnicore Agency, Pinterest There are million active users on Pinterest. Pinterest, Snapchat Snapchat has million daily active users. Brandwatch, In the U.
Quartz, As of May , the longest Snapchat streak is 1, snaps. Brandwatch, Snapchat users spent an average of Wallaroo Media, On average, Snapchat users under the age of 25 visit Snapchat over 20 times every day and spend over 30 minutes on the app every day. Zephoria, Statusbrew, User-generated content on social networks has a 4. Smart Insights, About 3.
Lyfe Marketing, Branded content on social media is twice as likely to interest people between the ages of 55 and 64 than those who are 28 and younger. BrizFeel, Written articles, videos, and images are the three most engaging types of content on social media. Lyfe Marketing, 2 million business are said to use Facebook for advertising in Hootsuite, Social media and video viewing are the two most popular online activities. Smart Insights, There are 2. Statitsa, Twitter There are million monthly active Twitter users as of Statitsa, In the US, there are 68 million monthly active Twitter users.
Pew Research Center, Twitter has nearly four times as many users internationally as in the U. Hootsuite, Tweets with videos get over six times as many retweets as tweets with photos. Wochit, Visual Content Content marketing gets three times more leads than paid search advertising. Demand Gen Report, Visual assets are the single biggest content contributor when it came to social media in Ofcom, million hours of video content are watched on Facebook daily.
HubSpot, Looking for more insight on marketing challenges? HubSpot asked 4, marketing and sales professionals about the future of inbound. Check out the State of Inbound report for the latest benchmark data. Get the Report.
- The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust (Gender and Culture Series);
- Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter..
- How To Fight Procrastination And Win.
Video Marketing Statistics. Marketing Land, 4 in 5 consumers believe that demo videos are helpful. HubSpot , Square videos are more effective than horizontal videos on Facebook. Animoto, Having a video thumbnail in the search results can double your search traffic. HubSpot , There are 1. Google, About 5 billion YouTube videos are viewed on average every day. Omnicore, Among millennials, YouTube accounts for two-thirds of the premium online video watched across devices.
Tubular Insights, Email Marketing Statistics. MarketingProfs, Marketers who send emails on Tuesdays get the highest open rates. Wordstream, Marketing and advertising companies have the lowest email open rates. Forbes, Nearly half of marketers say they sometimes test alternate subject lines to optimize email performance. Sleeknote, Spam email is more likely to bypass security filters today than it was in the recent past. The Radicati Group , Transactional emails receive eight times as many opens compared to regular marketing emails.
MailChimp, Email Usage There are over 6. Radicati Group, Active email accounts are expected to hit 5. Statitsa, Gmail has 1 billion active users worldwide. Emailmonday, Emails that display incorrectly on mobile may be deleted within three seconds. Litmus, State of Inbound. Download Now. Lead Generation Statistics. Content Marketing Institute, In the B2B setting, events help generate the most leads, while case studies help convert and accelerate the most leads. Content Marketing Institute, Most midsize to large organizations average less than 5, marketing qualified leads per month.
HubSpot , Lead generation, sales, and lead nurturing are the top three organizational objectives for content marketers.
Gartner, Mapping the customer experience and use of personalized content are deemed the most effective tactics for optimizing marketing automation. Ascend2, Marketing technology spend is now higher than advertising spend for companies. Gartner, Marketers say that the biggest benefit of automation is saving time.
Salesforce, Advertising Statistics. Digital Information World, The proportion of desktop and laptop users who use blockers is more than twice as large as the proportion of smartphone users who use blockers. Business Insider, Adblocker Plus is the most popular ad blocking app available. HubSpot , "Too many ads", "annoying or irrelevant ads" and "intrusive ads" are the top three motivations for ad-blocking.
HubSpot , The most popular display ad types are banners, native ads, and social media ads. HubSpot , Consumers now spend more than five hours a day on their smartphones. Impact, Both desktop and mobile ads deliver branding effectiveness, but mobile ads perform better. Business Insider, Two-thirds of consumers can recall a specific brand they have seen advertised on mobile in the last week. HubSpot , People pay attention to video content whereas they skim or multitask written content and podcasts. Wordstream, Consumers spend over 5 hours per day on their smartphones.
Marketing Technology Statistics.
Marketing technology impacts the way you reach your audience, how they consume your content, and how they interact with your brand. Marketing technology statistics provide insight into the best ways to connect with your audience and customers with the help of various applications, software, tools, and channels. HubSpot , million people use Facebook Messenger monthly. Statitsa, By , an estimated 2. Statitsa, There have been over 4 billion downloads of messenger apps. When does enhancement of human abilities cross a line by giving some people unfair advantages over others?
Paul Sheldon (Author of A Voice from the Pews)
What oversight and regulation of body- and brain-changing procedures is necessary? And how should the government or insurance marketplaces respond to the availability of life-altering technologies? The focus groups were deliberately structured to include highly religious Christians as well as Americans who have no religious affiliation. The participants were racially and ethnically diverse, including whites, Latinos and blacks.
And, since new biomedical developments are more likely to affect younger generations, the groups included a mix of Millennials and middle-aged adults. This report describes the wide-ranging discussions that occurred in those focus groups, which, like the survey, centered around three potential kinds of human enhancements: gene-editing techniques that could give healthy babies a reduced risk of serious diseases over the course of their lives, computer chips implanted in the brains of healthy people that may help improve their concentration and ability to process information, and transfusions of synthetic blood designed to increase oxygen levels and give healthy people greater speed, strength and stamina.
See Appendix A for full descriptions. Accordingly, participants in the focus groups were asked to think about scientific advances that were, in many cases, unfamiliar to them and then to perform acts of moral imagination, anticipating societal reactions to possible biomedical interventions. Though focus groups do not provide a representative portrait of the general public, they can yield insights into how individuals think about complex topics.
- SHIFT YOUR FATE: Life-Changing Wisdom For Proactive Kidney Patients.
- American Voices on Ways Human Enhancement Could Shape Our Future | Pew Research Center.
- Related Products.
- Download PDF A Voice from the Pews : Insights from a Common Man;
- My Heart is Important!: a heart healing guide?
- Prophet, Priest, Sage and People.
- A Voice from the Pews, Insights from a Common Man by Paul Sheldon | | Booktopia?
The three kinds of human enhancements — though far from an exhaustive list of biomedical technologies now under development — were chosen to cover a range of procedures from blood transfusions to brain surgery and goals improved physical abilities, improved thinking abilities, improved offspring.
Within these limitations, the participants engaged in thoughtful and often passionate conversations. Their discussions revealed a number of clues about how and where Americans draw moral boundaries when considering scientific breakthroughs. And, to a considerable extent, the focus groups gave voice to concerns echoed in a representative survey of the general public.
Council Post: 15 Biggest Challenges Women Leaders Face And How To Overcome Them
Each focus group consisted of seven or eight adults coming together for an hour and a half to two hours for a discussion led by a professional moderator. Birmingham, Alabama, Jan. Dedham, Massachusetts, Jan. Atlanta, Georgia, Feb. Often, the conversations reflected optimism about the march of science and technology, mixed with darker fatalism about social change.
- Related content!
- Givenomics: How Giving Creates Sustainable Success for Companies, Customers and Communities!
- Exploring the Religion of Ancient Israel.
- Follow Us:.
- Political Polarization in the American Public;
- The Ultimate List of Marketing Statistics for 12222.
- Prepare for the voice revolution.
The focus groups were not pressed to reach agreement. But the general arc of the discussions, paraphrased broadly, might go something like this: Progress with technology and medical research is inevitable. Still, such developments are disquieting. Some people will be left behind as human enhancements become available, and someone or some part of the government will need to watch carefully to rein in potential abuses, because we are heading to a place where the boundary between human and nonhuman becomes quite blurry. As they were asked to weigh pluses and minuses of these possibilities, many alternated between thinking about what they would do if their personal circumstances led them to consider an enhancement and thinking about how society would change if these enhancements were made available to everyone.
It was telling that all the focus groups could easily construct substantial lists of advantages and disadvantages that might emerge if these new biomedical technologies become widely available to healthy people. Participants in each focus group were selected to have some shared characteristics such as race, ethnicity, age or religious background to facilitate open discussion.
Related A Voice from the Pews : Insights from a Common Man
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved